Generation Of Cancer Vaccines Research Articles

Towards the next generation of cancer vaccines

During the past decade we have extensively explored dendritic cell based cancer vaccines. Dendritic cells (DC) isolated from a patient are loaded with tumor antigen and immune modulators to activate dendritic cells to optimize antigen presentation and T cell stimulation. We now know that this form of immunotherapy is safe and more recently we have also started to use natural DC circulating in the blood instead of monocyte derived DC. In particular myeloid DC and plasmacytoid DC are a powerful combination, now being tested in a phase III trial. Because with current DC based vaccinations a new vaccine must be generated for each patient, we have initiated studies to look for alternatives, where we either can target DC in vivo by nanoparticles, or even replace DC by the generation of ‘synthetic DC’. During my talk I will elaborate on these novel cancer vaccine developments and on the idea to design ‘synthetic lymph nodes’ for local cancer treatment.

At the bench: Engineering the next generation of cancer vaccines.

Cancer vaccines hold promise as an immunotherapeutic modality based on their potential to generate tumor antigen-specific T cell responses and long-lived antitumor responses capable of combating metastatic disease and recurrence. However, cancer vaccines have historically failed to deliver significant therapeutic benefit in the clinic, which we maintain is due in part to drug delivery challenges that have limited vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy. In this review, we examine some of the known and putative failure mechanisms of common first-generation clinical cancer vaccines, and describe how the rational design of materials engineered for vaccine delivery and immunomodulation can address these shortcomings. First, we outline vaccine design principles for augmenting cellular immunity to tumor antigens and describe how well-engineered materials can improve vaccine efficacy, highlighting recent innovations in vaccine delivery technology that are primed for integration into neoantigen vaccine development pipelines. We also discuss the importance of sequencing, timing, and kinetics in mounting effective immune responses to cancer vaccines, and highlight examples of materials that potentiate antitumor immunity through spatiotemporal control of immunomodulation. Furthermore, we describe several engineering strategies for improving outcomes ofin situcancer vaccines, which leverage local, intratumoral delivery to stimulate systemic immunity. Finally, we highlight recent innovations leveraging nanotechnology for increasing the immunogenicity of the tumor microenvironment (TME), which is critical to enhancing tumor infiltration and function of T cells elicited in response to cancer vaccines. These immunoengineering strategies and tools complement ongoing advances in cancer vaccines as they reemerge as an important component of the immunotherapeutic armamentarium.

Advances in Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to induce durable antitumor immunity that is capable of systemic protection against tumor recurrence or metastatic disease. Many approaches to therapeutic cancer vaccines have been explored, with varying levels of success. However, with the exception of Sipuleucel T, an ex vivo dendritic cell vaccine for prostate cancer, no therapeutic cancer vaccine has yet shown clinical efficacy in phase 3 randomized trials. Though disappointing, lessons learned from these studies have suggested new strategies to improve cancer vaccines. The clinical success of checkpoint blockade has underscored the role of peripheral tolerance mechanisms in limiting vaccine responses and highlighted the potential for combination therapies. Recent advances in transcriptome sequencing, computational modeling, and material engineering further suggest new opportunities to intensify cancer vaccines. This review will discuss the major approaches to therapeutic cancer vaccination and explore recent advances that inform the design of the next generation of cancer vaccines.

Recent Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy with an Emphasis on Vaccines

Recent Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy with an Emphasis on Vaccines was the first meeting organized by the European Society of Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy and Progress in Vaccine against Cancer, in collaboration with the Institute of Biological Research and Biotechnology of the National Hellenic Research Foundation, in a joint effort towards the setting up of a new generation of cancer vaccines. The main topics of the meeting included: the role of the tumor microenvironment in protecting the tumor from immune attack; differences in immunotherapy outcome in hematological malignancies versus solid tumors; rationale of multi-epitope vaccines; Treg cell elimination/inactivation, tumor stroma destruction, angiogenesis inhibition and the potentiality of ‘preventive’ vaccination in breast, colon, prostate and ovarian cancer in the early stages and during the ‘wait-and-see’ period. The ninth Progress in Vaccines against Cancer meeting will be held in Sofia, Bulgaria, 8–10 October 2009, at the Hilton Hotel.

HER-2/neu Cancer Vaccines: Present Status and Future Prospects

Immunotherapeutic approaches to cancer should focus on novel undertakings that modulate immune responses by synergistic enhancement of anti-tumor immunological parameters. Cancer vaccines should preferably be composed of multiple defined tumor antigen specific B- and T-cell epitopes. The main focus of this article is to briefly review the present status of Her-2/neu vaccine strategies and to describe the innovative strategies developed in my laboratory for a vaccine against HER-2/neu (ErbB-2) with emphasis on the humoral arm of the immune response. Elucidating the underlining mechanisms of anti-tumor effects elicited by peptide vaccines against a self-protein is a requirement for developing an immunotherapeutic strategy that might be effective in human cancer vaccines. Our approach entails the identification of biologically relevant epitopes, establishing relevant in vitro assays for monitoring vaccine efficacy, devising strategies to engineer conformationally dependent sequences, developing highly immunogenic vaccines for an outbred population and delivering the immunogen/vaccine in a safe and efficacious vehicle, utilizing transgenic animal models for assessing tumor development, and developing challenge models using transplantable tumors to study efficacy of vaccine constructs. We have developed a multi-HER-2/neu B-cell epitope approach and shown in preclinical studies that immunization with a combination of two B-cell epitope was more effective in preventing mammary tumors than a single epitope. We have translated that work to the clinic (OSU 0105) in an FDA approved, NCI sponsored “Phase 1 Active Immunotherapy trial with Chimeric and Multi-epitope based peptide vaccine targeting HER-2 oncoprotein and nor-MDP adjuvant in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent solid tumors” at the James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University. The correlation between overexpression of HER-2/neu and up-regulation of VEGF has been demonstrated in breast cancer patients. Thus, blocking angiogenesis is an attractive strategy to inhibit tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. The hypothesis that combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and tumor immunotherapy of cancer may be synergistic is an important future goal. In this review, I will discuss insights into our preclinical studies that might aid in the design of the next generation of cancer vaccines and become an integrated component of prophylactic/preventive and therapeutic approach.

Cancer vaccines: the challenge of developing an ideal tumor killing system

Despite the evidence that the immune system plays a significant role in controlling tumor growth in natural conditions and in response to therapeutic vaccination, cancer cells can survive their attack as the disease progresses and no vaccination regimen should be currently proposed to patients outside experimental clinical trials. Clinical results show that the immune system can be actively polarized against malignant cells by means of a variety of vaccination strategies, and that in some cases this is associated with tumor regression. This implies that under some unique circumstances, the naturally "dormant" immune effectors can actually be put at work and used as endogenous weapons against malignant cells. Consequently, the main challenge of tumor immunologists appears to lie on the ability of reproducing those conditions in a larger set of patients. The complexity of the immune network and the still enigmatic host-tumor interactions make these tasks at the same time challenging and fascinating. Recent tumor immunology findings are giving new impetus to the development of more effective vaccination strategies and might revolutionize the way of designing the next generation of cancer vaccines. In the near future, the implementation of these insights in the clinical setting and the completion/conduction of comparative randomized phase III trials will allow oncologists to define the actual role of cancer vaccines in the fight against malignancy.

Colorectal cancer vaccines: Principles, results, and perspectives

In the search for novel therapeutic approaches to treat patients with colorectal carcinoma, anticancer vaccination holds promise. A large body of preclinical and clinical evidence has demonstrated that the immune system can be polarized against malignant cells by means of several active specific immunotherapy strategies. Although no vaccination regimen can be currently recommended outside clinical trials, tumor response and immunologic findings observed in animal models and humans prompt researchers to explore further the antitumor potential of such biotherapy in an effort to reproduce in a larger set of patients the cascade of molecular events that characterizes the successful tumor immune rejection currently observed in a minority of vaccinated subjects. In this work, we summarize the principles and the main results of cancer vaccine strategies so far implemented for the treatment of patients with colorectal carcinoma. We also discuss the most recent preclinical tumor immunology insights that might change the way to design the next generation of cancer vaccines, hopefully improving the effectiveness of such a biotherapeutic approach.

TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ANTIGENS: FROM DISCOVERY TO IMMUNITY

There is a renewed enthusiasm for therapeutic vaccination as a viable treatment for patients with cancer. Early tumor vaccines were comprised of whole tumor cells, fragments of tumor cells, or protein lysate from tumor cells. Limited results with these approaches led investigators to begin developing the next generation of cancer vaccines based on defined tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Defining and characterizing TAAs for human cancer, development of new approaches for identifying TAAs, and novel strategies to deliver the antigens as potent therapeutic vaccines have all been the focus of intense research in the past decade and will continue to be the focus for decades tocome. tumor antigens vaccines antigen discovery tumor immunity

Epitope- and Antigen-specific Cancer Vaccines

Anti-idiotypic antibodies (Ab2) that functionally mimic epitopes associated with human cancer cells are the most specific cancer vaccines currently available. Ab2 can induce specific humoral anti-tumor immunity in cancer patients. However, the potential of Ab2 for inducing cellular immunity in cancer patients still requires demonstration. Clonotypic antibodies directed against the combining site for tumor Ag on human T-cell clones may provide highly effective reagents for inducing protective T-cell immunity against human cancer. A new generation of cancer vaccines, molecularly cloned tumor-associated antigens (Ag), has recently been developed. Recombinant Ag have been successfully expressed in vectors allowing large scale production of Ag for immunization of cancer patients. Recombinant tumor Ag was shown to induce specific and protective immunity in experimental animals. In contrast to Ab2, which may mimic a single cancer-associated epitope, recombinant Ag express multiple epitopes that are potentially immunogenic. Ag vaccines, therefore, may be more effective in arresting tumor growth than single epitope (Ab2) vaccines because tumor destruction by antibodies is dependent on antibody density on tumor cell surfaces. In light of the important roles that both B and T cells play in the control of tumor growth, the demonstration of induction of specific B and T cell-immunity by recombinant tumor Ag and Ab2 in experimental animals is encouraging. Ultimately, the immunomodulatory role of both types of vaccines has to be compared in cancer patients who are immunologically tolerant to many Ag/epitopes expressed by their growing tumors. The development of both Ab2 and recombinant Ag for single antigenic systems provides the first step towards this goal.